Ithaka’s 2006 Studies of Key Stakeholders in the Digital Transformation in Higher Education by Ross Housewright and Roger Schonfeld, August 18, 2008

Current Models of Digital Scholarly Communication: Results of an Investigation Conducted by Ithaka for the Association of Research Libraries, by Nancy L. Maron and K. Kirby Smith, Association of Research Libraries, November 2008

Joan F. Cheverie and Jennifer Boettcher and John Buschman. “Digital Scholarship in the University Tenure and Promotion Process: A Report on the Sixth Scholarly Communication Symposium at Georgetown University Library.” Journal of Scholarly Publishing 40.3 (2009): 219-230

Plus One

Karla L. Hahn, “Research Library Publishing Services: New Options for University Publishing” (Washington DC: Association of Colleges and Research Libraries, March 2008), http://www.educause.edu/Resources/ResearchLibraryPublishingServi/163079

Recasting the Role of Comprehensive University Libraries: Starting Points for
Educating Librarians on the Issues of Scholarly Communication and
Institutional Repositories

Selling pts.

Visibility
Branding
Students for future employers (hmm ,, need driving innov… anticipate)

Physics … big

1. mit
2. harvad
3. berkley
4. stanford
5. princeton

#25 Southamton (1st to mandate publ. in OA journals)

——- GVSU  —-

Schl. Comm. Wrkshps

4 sessions:

- readings before and into
- find journals or models in their field – how can lib help
- outreach – author rights
- relationships/stakeholders within Univ.

-> annual reception for published faculty

Publishing in Open Access Journals in the Social Sciences and Humanities: Who’s Doing it and Why?

Coonin – East Carolina
Younce  Auburn (after May 18)

free access for all
authors pays ( 26% psychology .. and science) – DOAJ lists pay vs free ($100 Soc. Sci. -$5000 in Science)
peer review is at the heart
electronic is not OA
Culture of discipline
comfort of tenure (tenured more accept.)

Can Library encourage Faculty publ. in Open Access .. cost benefit to Library (but author pays)

smells a bit like vanity publ. to some

edge vs fringe (accepting – lagging in Soc. Sci and Humanities)

excellent survey and charts .. see Virtual Conf.

Manuscript Central

ScholarOne

Clinical Medicine Netprints: http://clinmed.netprints.org/