‘Sabbatical Research and Thinking’ Category Archives

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »
 
20
Apr

Science Commons

by admin in Sabbatical Research and Thinking

No Comments Comments


more about “Science Commons“, posted with vodpod

20
Apr

This is Scholarship

by admin in Sabbatical Research and Thinking

No Comments Comments


This is Scholarship

Selected Works Referenced

Promotion & Tenure Policy Documents

College of Arts & Sciences. (2006). RPT document. California State University San Marcos. Retrieved January 18, 2008, from http://www.csusm.edu/faculty_affairs/Evaluation%20Page.html

College of Humanities. (2005). Appointments, promotion, and tenure document. The Ohio State University. Retrieved January 18, 2008, from https://humanities.osu.edu/cohi/FacultyDocuments/apt/

College of Liberal Arts & Sciences. (1994). College promotion, tenure, and reappointment document. Indiana University South Bend. Retrieved January 18, 2008, from http://www.iusb.edu/~lasi/documents/ptrdocument.pdf

New & Remediated Forms of Scholarship

Arola, Kristin L., & Ball, Cheryl E. (2007). A conversation: From ‘they call me doctor?!’ to tenure. Computers and Composition Online. Retrieved July 19, 2007, from http://www.bgsu.edu/cconline/doctor/

Braun, Catherine C., McCorkle, Ben, & Wolf, Amie C. (2007). Remixing basic writing: Digital media production and the basic writing curriculum. Computers and Composition Online. Retrieved July 19, 2007, from http://www.bgsu.edu/cconline/braun/index.htm

Brooks, Kevin, Tomanek, Michael, Wald, Rachel, Warner, Matthew, & Wilkening, Brianne. (2006). What’s going on? Listening to music, composing videos. Computers and Composition Online. Retrieved January 18, 2008, from http://www.bgsu.edu/cconline/brooks/index.htm

Crane, Gregory. (Ed.). (n.d.). The Perseus Digital Library. Retrieved January 18, 2008, from http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/

Cushman, Ellen. (2004). Composing new media: Cultivating landscapes of the mind. Kairos, 9(1). Retrieved July 19, 2007, from http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/9.1/binder.html?http://www.msu.edu/%7Ecushmane/one/landscape.html

Davis, Evan, & Hardy, Sarah. (2003). Teaching writing in the space of blackboard. Computers and Composition Online. Retrieved July 19, 2007, from http://www.bgsu.edu/cconline/DavisHardy/index.html

Ellertson, Anthony. (2003). Some notes on simulacra machines, Flash in first-year composition, and tactics in spaces of interruption. Kairos, 8(2). Retrieved July 19, 2007, from http://english.ttu.edu/KAIROS/8.2/binder.html?features/ellertson/home.html

Rice, Rich, & Ball, Cheryl. (2006). Reading the text: Remediating the text. Kairos, 10 (2). Retrieved July 19, 2007, from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/10.2/binder2.html?coverweb/riceball/index.html

Sorapure, Madeleine. (2006). Between modes: Assessing student new media compositions. Kairos, 10(2). Retrieved July 19, 2007, from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/10.2/binder2.html?coverweb/sorapure/index.html

Walker, Joyce. (2006). Hyper.activity. Kairos, 10(1). Retrieved July 19, 2007, from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/10.2/binder2.html?coverweb/walker/index.html

Wesch, Michael. (2007). Web 2.0…The machine is us/ing us. Retrieved January 18, 2008, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gmP4nk0EOE

19
Apr

3 minutes to capture attention…

by admin in Sabbatical Research and Thinking

No Comments Comments

3 minutes to capture attention of conservative faculty re: New Scholarly Communication..What would you say/show? Feedback much appreciated

16
Apr

New Scholarship Issues Impossi…

by admin in Sabbatical Research and Thinking

No Comments Comments

New Scholarship Issues Impossible to articulate to unwashed in 40 mins.. OA, Pre-pub, E-only, Collective Intell, P&T, Content vs Process

16
Apr

Yet another iteration – working doc

by admin in Sabbatical Research and Thinking

No Comments Comments


I.  Traditional journals migrate online (Early 90s’)

Cause: 

  • Because its there.
  • Leverage significant strengths of non-linear functions .. hyperlinking, full text searching

Effect:

  • Paper-inspired model, same publication and peer-review process
  • Retains and enhances Subscriber-pays model
  • A radical change when it comes to access, but not a radical change in the publication model itself

Example: A print journal that publishes an exact replica online

II. Traditional Paper models becoming unsustainable (swapped OA heading for cost idea)

Cause:

  • Library budgets either flat or in decline
  • Movement led by libraries subscribing to STM (science/technology/medicine) titles which they could no longer afford
  • Call for publicly-funded research to be made freely available
  • LIbraries supporting their scholars research can not afford to buy it back

Effect:

  • Open access journals begin to emerge (date?)
  • Retains quality-control of traditionally-published journals (peer-review, editorial board) but journals are free
  • Author-pays model instead of subscriber-pays model

Example: BioMed Central

III. Quantity of available research explodes prompting new access and organization paradigm

Cause:

  • Quantity of research is constantly growing; journals on new topics being started all of the time (moved from above category)
  • Need for Speed: Emerged in response to the need to speed dissemination of research
  • Ease of publication

Effect:

  • Subject archives emerge
  • Publish e-prints which includes pre-prints (not yet peer reviewed) or post-prints (peer reviewed)
  • Author deposits paper into the archive (self-archiving)

Example: arXiv.org

 
IV. Taking Back the Rightful Ownership

Cause:

  • New avenues for dissemination authors have publication alternatives
  • Opportunities for new research sharing mechanisms
  • Technology encourages and facilitates collaboration

Effect:

  • Institutional repositories emerge (date?)
  • Encouraged by SPARC report in 2002; access improved through development of OAI metadata protocol
  • A place to publish and archive the research output of an institution
  • Undermines concept that value is derived from the place where an item is placed/published
  • Issues of authority

Example: ?

——————————-

???
 
Experimentation with media to see what it can do

  • Focused primarily on the opportunities that digital media provide
  • Example: Perseus/Vectors/Google Earth projects, or something along those lines

 
Social networking tools

  • Emerged more recently as a tool for scholarly communication
  • Example: maybe use example from Media Res (CSI video and Chad’s essay)

 ——————————-

History of academic publishing and the results (or why we are where we are)
http://library.kent.ac.uk/library/papers/jwts/develop.htm

“Most of the results of scientific, technical and medical (STM) research are published as papers or articles in refereed journals. These journals have developed over time to a standard model. The researcher submits a prospective paper to a journal relevant to the topic. The editorial board of that journal checks for relevance and basic quality. The articles that pass this test are sent to referees who assess it for overall quality. They may reject it, accept it with changes, or accept it as is. Accepted papers are copy-edited to improve appearance, readability, etc. The article is then collected together with others and published in an issue of the journal. All of this has been influenced by the model of publishing required by the paper-based journal. For example the logistics of the paper journal give rise to the ‘issue’. There is nothing in the design of the research paper that requires that it be published as part of an issue. The need to co-ordinate the activities of editors, referees, printers, distributors, marketing departments, etc, has given rise to the ‘publisher’. In order to recover the cost of operating this organisation the publisher usually requires the writer of the paper to pass copyright in the paper to the publishing company. Finally the publisher sells subscriptions to the journal to cover the production and distribution cost and to make a profit. Thus we have the rather odd situation that the writer (researcher) gives away the rights of the paper for free then he/she needs to be a subscriber (that is, to pay) to read the journal in which it is published. The whole academic journal publishing industry is based on the fact the producers (researchers) of the goods (papers) give them away in exchange for dissemination and then have to buy access back in the form of subscriptions.”

15
Apr

Bergren Draft Notes:

by admin in Sabbatical Research and Thinking

No Comments Comments

Once upon a time

There were Traditonal Paper-Based Research/Scholarship ..

[image]

  • The content of these journals were sanctioned, published, and peer reviewed by credible external entities such as scholarly societies, research institutions, or government agencies
  • The content was presented in accepted scholarly formats of research papers, reports, conference/symposia presentations, and independent research
  • The content relied on a textual expression of valid data produced by a tested, measurable, information gathering process.  The result of which, provided new insight to an idea or process that quoted, extended, built upon or altered the work of others.
  • The content often provided points of visual reference which included images, graphs, charts, statistical presentations, etc.
  • The sponsoring agency sanctioned the validity and relevance of the content primarily by peer review
  • The presentation was published in bound paper entities of soft or hard covered containers at regular or irregular intervals based on established criteria
  • The presentation included clear authority or authorship responsible for the content as well as clear attribution where the work of others was used in its arguments.
  • The sponsoring agency distributed the publication to its members and subscribers for a price.

—————

Then came the Internet

And it became possible for credible external entities to …

  • Leverage a faster wider network of peer review and validation opprtunities
  • Improve upon traditional scholarly presentation formats to illustrate and reinforce textual and abstract content in more efficient, non-linear, multimodal ways
  • Easier to access and gather information from more sources
  • Easier to test, measure and validate data, using computational systems
  • Invites the opportunity to store, reuse and share oft discarded raw data
  • Cheaper to produce
  • Easier to distribute to members and subscribers or make available to all
  • Easier to reproduce, extend, quote, alter
  • Barriers to frequency of publication may be removed
  • Opportunities to enhance referential and supporting content through sound, video, advanced imaging and simulation presentation
  • Opportunity to reconsider (not abandon) matters of authority and atribution and leverage the significant power of collaboration
  • Opportunity for good work to spread faster and quantify actual usage post-publication

———-
We might ask ourselves ..

  1. Is the publisher/sanctioning agency credible? What is this threshold?
  2. Is the scholarship Peer Reviewed? – and how? (traditional, comments, open PR)
  3. Is authority for the work and supporting references well established?  Does it need to be? (collaboration, community)
  4. Does this scholarship gain from presentation and distribution in an electronic format?
    (visually, functionally, accuracy, usability, accessibilty, financially, data reuse, etc.?)
  5. Would this research flourish if it were available free to all?

—-

So what actually happened in scholarly publication…

Publishers began testing the waters:

  • Journals built online versions of their journals
  • Authors retained their rights to their research and distributed where and how they wish
  • Presentation of Scholarship incorporating new media formats

A Crisis of Costs spurred:

  • Some Journals have migrated to online-only versions of their journals
  • Libraries resist duplication, cut paper titles, and invest in online access.  Several Institutions move to Online-Only (name them)
  • Thousands of new online peer reviewed journals have been created

Innovations occurred

  • New models of Peer review evolved
  • New models of publication emerges and expands beyond societies and institutions to larger discipline-centric scholarly “portals” (
  • Repositories of related research is gathered and organized in new places and new ways. (BioCentral)
  • Institutional repositories or Pseudo-University Presses emerge (MIT)
  • Peer Reviewed Open Access Electronic Journals makes a big

Final Ponder… What has changed?  Which should we emphasize?

Process of Electronic Pubishing
How it alters content

15
Apr

AuBergren Wed. 4/15

by admin in Sabbatical Research and Thinking

No Comments Comments

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

15
Apr

Bergrenlink Wed 4/15

by admin in Sabbatical Research and Thinking

No Comments Comments

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

15
Apr

E Only Journals Samples

by admin in Sabbatical Research and Thinking

No Comments Comments

Samples

Ejournal Only Peer Reviewed Titles

Chemical educator

Catalysis Surveys from Japan

13
Apr

Levittown and Mass Amateurization

by admin in Sabbatical Research and Thinking

No Comments Comments

Levittown and Mass Amateurization

Levittown Memorial HS Alumni
Growing up in Levittown
Levittown Roller Rink

Facebook

- leads to related groups and their discussion and photos

Personal memories
Relevant questions

Groups

265 members

Discovery – Levittown, Puerto Rico

13
Apr

Ideas for Scholes on Return

by admin in Sabbatical Research and Thinking

No Comments Comments

Ideas for Scholes on Return

Web

New Books
Twitter – Libns .. quick notes, announcements

13
Apr

Notes for Book

by admin in Sabbatical Research and Thinking

No Comments Comments

* Notes

  1. Footnote formats from Crawford
  2. CC License type BY-NC – #

    Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).

    Attribute this work:

    What does “Attribute this work” mean?
    The page you came from contained embedded licensing metadata, including how the creator wishes to be attributed for re-use. You can use the HTML here to cite the work. Doing so will also include metadata on your page so that others can find the original work as well.
     
    Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes.  

  5. Other notice - 43 Folders® is a registered trademark of Merlin Mann. All posts and
    comments © their original owners. Everything else (including the
    design) is © Merlin Mann, 2004-2008. Merlin’s posts can be reused or
    republished solely in accordance with the BY-NC-ND Creative Commons License. Please don’t be a douche with my stuff. Here’s our Legal and Ground Rules. 43 Folders loves you, and so does Lawrence.

Introduction – Thesis

Methodology and Experiment

  • - Crawford – p3. Use quote from¹
  • - try to make sense ¹
  • - try allow myself to fail
  • - conversations continue e-version on wp-commenting theme/ ebook /
  • - continutiy w/ mashup

Case in point:

  • - more will read blog post more than will ever read this book¹

Chapter on Twitter – “keep it short”

——–
¹ p.3 Crawford

9
Apr

Wired Campus: Professor Encour…

by admin in Sabbatical Research and Thinking

No Comments Comments

Wired Campus: Professor Encourages Students to Pass Notes During Class — via Twitter – Chronicle.com http://tinyurl.com/cc5axz

5
Apr

ccLearn

by admin in Sabbatical Research and Thinking

No Comments Comments

more about "ccLearn", posted with vodpod

5
Apr

Creative Commons | Commons

by admin in Sabbatical Research and Thinking

No Comments Comments

more about "Creative Commons | Commons", posted with vodpod